Tarmack LogoRequest a demo

EOR

PEO vs EOR: Key Differences Explained

October 9, 2025 | Jessica Wisniewski

PEO vs EOR: Key Differences Explained
  • TL;DR: PEO vs EOR at a Glance
  • What is a Professional Employer Organization (PEO)?
  • What is an Employer of Record (EOR)?
  • PEO vs EOR — The Critical Differences
  • How to Choose Between a PEO and an EOR
  • Vendor Due-Diligence Checklist
  • How Tarmack Does it

Expanding into a new market sounds simple until you meet the compliance wall, payroll registration, contracts in local languages, and mandatory benefits you’ve never heard of. 

That’s when most companies start looking at two options: a Professional Employer Organization (PEO) or an Employer of Record (EOR). The terms may sound similar, but the structures are not.

  • A PEO operates on a co-employment model. You must already have a legal entity in the country, and you share employer responsibilities with the PEO.
  • An EOR becomes the legal employer on your behalf. You do not need to set up an entity, and the EOR manages payroll, contracts, and compliance directly.

This difference decides how fast you can hire, how much risk you hold, and how much you spend on entities you may not even need.

In this guide, we’ll cover:

  • what each model actually does,
  • the hidden costs teams don’t expect,
  • the compliance risks that keep HR leaders awake, and
  • a clear framework for choosing the right partner.

Now you can easily hire & employ international remote talent in full time jobs without opening international subsidiaries. Find out more about Tarmack's Employer of Record services.

Get Started

TL;DR: PEO vs EOR at a Glance

Choosing between an employer of record vs PEO comes down to entity ownership, legal responsibility, and speed of expansion. The table below summarizes the differences:

DimensionPEO (Professional Employer Organization)EOR (Employer of Record)
Legal employerYou and the PEO share co-employment responsibilitiesThe EOR is the sole legal employer in-country
Entity requirementYou must already have a local entityNo entity required
Compliance liabilityShared — your business remains legally exposedEOR assumes local employment compliance
Scope of servicesPayroll, benefits, and HR admin for employees in your entityPayroll, benefits, contracts, and compliance for employees hired through the EOR
Immigration supportLimited, since sponsorship depends on your entityOften included, but varies by country and case
Speed to hireFast once your entity is set upFast from the start — typically within weeks
Best fitDomestic operations or countries where you already operateHiring in new markets without entity setup
A side-by-side look at how PEOs and EORs differ across structure, compliance, and hiring speed.

For companies that need to hire internationally without establishing entities, the EOR model is usually the more practical option. A PEO is better suited when you already have a presence in-country and want to outsource HR and compliance tasks.

💡 Community signal: On Reddit and G2, teams complain most about opaque fees and slow support with both models. The contract may look clean, but hidden FX spreads, payroll delays, or weak country support often show up later. Always ask for sample invoices, landed cost breakdowns, and response-time SLAs before you sign.

What is a Professional Employer Organization (PEO)?

A Professional Employer Organization (PEO) is an outsourced HR partner that shares employer responsibilities through a co-employment arrangement. In this model, your company remains the legal employer of your staff but delegates many administrative HR functions to the PEO.

PEOs typically manage:

  • Payroll and tax filings
  • Benefits administration (health insurance, retirement plans, workers’ compensation)
  • Employment law compliance support
  • HR policies, training, and employee handbooks

Because PEOs pool employees from multiple clients, they can often negotiate better health insurance rates and retirement benefits than individual small or mid-sized companies could secure on their own. This enables businesses to offer competitive benefits without building a full internal HR infrastructure.

Hidden Risk:  In the U.S., payroll tax resets can kick in if you join a PEO mid-year. Employers sometimes end up paying Social Security contributions twice — up to $9,114 per employee in 2024. Always confirm how mid-year transitions are handled.

Key considerations:

  • Certified PEOs (CPEOs): In the U.S., Certified PEOs shift payroll tax liability to the PEO, backed by strict financial reporting. Non-certified PEOs leave some liability with the client.
  • Payroll Tax Resets: Switching employees to a PEO mid-year can cause double Social Security tax payments up to the wage base, surprisingly increasing costs.
  • Benefits Flexibility: PEOs offer pooled benefits, which are cost-effective for smaller teams but may limit choice and customization as a company grows.
  • Offboarding Fees: Some PEO contracts may charge fees for COBRA administration, benefits transfers, or termination processing.

Best fit for:

PEOs suit domestic teams or companies that want to outsource HR administration while keeping direct employment responsibility.

💡 Tip: Always verify CPEO status using the IRS public list to understand who holds payroll tax liability.

What is an Employer of Record (EOR)?

An Employer of Record (EOR) is a third-party company that legally employs your workforce in foreign countries through its own registered entities. 

Unlike a Professional Employer Organization (PEO), which requires you to have a local legal entity beforehand, the EOR takes full responsibility for hiring and managing employees in markets where you may not have a physical presence.

This setup allows you to quickly hire talent in new countries without the time, expense, and complexity of establishing subsidiaries.

EOR responsibilities include:

  • Drafting and issuing locally compliant employment contracts
  • Administering payroll and handling tax filings with authorities
  • Providing statutory benefits such as healthcare, pensions, and paid leave
  • Managing employee termination processes per local labor laws
  • Sponsoring work visas or permits in applicable regions

While the EOR is the legal employer, your team maintains control over day-to-day activities, performance management, and work direction.

Compliance and liability:

The EOR assumes the legal liability for employment compliance within the respective country. Any errors in payroll, taxes, or labor audits rest on the EOR’s shoulders, making them the preferred option for companies expanding globally without local entities. 

Key considerations:

  • Contract compliance: Ensure the provider customizes contracts per local laws rather than relying on generic templates. Otherwise, you might face country caveats. For instance, Spain’s labor code restricts “labor leasing.” Courts disagree on whether EORs fit. 
  • Transparent pricing: Watch for hidden fees such as foreign exchange margins or costs for immigration services, and request sample invoices upfront.
  • Service quality: Assess support responsiveness, especially for country-specific compliance guidance, and request clear service-level agreements (SLAs).
  • Payroll accuracy: Understand how providers monitor and correct payroll errors to guarantee timely payments.

Best suited for:

  • Companies piloting new markets or hiring small teams (1–20 employees)
  • Startups and fast-growing firms are expanding rapidly across borders
  • Businesses seeking to avoid the costs and complexities of opening foreign legal entities
💡 Tip: Immigration sponsorship is not guaranteed by all EORs. Always verify visa eligibility and associated costs before extending job offers.With Tarmack, you also get owned entities, in-country legal experts, and transparent pricing, so you can move fast, stay compliant, and skip the hidden-fee surprises that frustrate most teams.

PEO vs EOR — The Critical Differences

At a glance, both models promise “easier hiring.” Look closer, and the gaps are obvious. Six factors decide whether a PEO or an EOR is even an option for you:

  • Legal employer: With a PEO, you stay on the hook as the employer of record. They share payroll and HR functions, but liability isn’t off your desk. With an EOR, the provider becomes the sole legal employer in that country. That shift is what allows you to operate without an entity of your own.
  • Entity requirement: A PEO only works if you already have a registered entity. Many HR teams discover this late and waste months setting up subsidiaries they didn’t plan for. An EOR, by contrast, uses its own entity, which is why it’s the faster path to hiring in a new market.
Do you know? HR managers on Reddit often assume they can “plug into” a PEO anywhere, only to find out they must set up an entity first.

  • Compliance risk: A PEO shares risk. If a filing is wrong or an employee disputes their contract, you may still be dragged into the process. With an EOR, compliance liability sits with them. That doesn’t mean you can ignore oversight. Buyers often report issues with generic contract templates that don’t reflect local law, but the EOR is the party responsible.
Regulation alert: Across Europe, the 2024 Platform Work Directive makes it harder to treat long-term workers as contractors. If your hiring model depends on contractors, you may face forced reclassification into employment.

  • Scope of services: PEOs are HR outsourcers. They run payroll, pool benefits, and manage workers’ comp. EORs go further: drafting local contracts, paying statutory benefits, managing terminations, and in some cases, sponsoring visas.
  • Benefits: A PEO can negotiate pooled benefit plans, which is attractive if you’re small. Payroll tax resets are another hidden cost. EORs, on the contrary, stick to statutory benefits with optional add-ons, but teams often flag hidden markups or admin fees when moving employees off the platform.
Know this: In the UK, April 2024 holiday pay reforms require stricter tracking for irregular-hours workers. If your PEO or EOR hasn’t updated its payroll engine, you’re still liable for underpayment claims.

  • Cost model: PEOs charge flat admin fees or a percentage of payroll. On paper, it looks cheaper. In practice, you’re still paying to open and maintain entities — incorporation can run $15,000–$20,000 in markets like Germany and take 4–6 months. EORs look more expensive per head ($500–$700/month typically), but the fee usually replaces months of entity setup and ongoing filings.
💡 Next read: The Future of EOR: 2030 Trends

How to Choose Between a PEO and an EOR

The choice isn’t about preference. It comes down to the structure of your business today and how you plan to grow in the next 12 to 24 months.

Do you already own a legal entity in the country?
If yes, you can use either model. A PEO will manage HR tasks while you remain the legal employer. If no, an EOR is the only option. It hires through its own entity, so you don’t have to create one.

How quickly do you need to hire?
Entity setup can take months. A PEO only becomes useful once that step is complete. An EOR allows you to start onboarding in weeks, since the infrastructure is already in place.

What level of risk are you prepared to carry?
With a PEO, liability is shared. Your company is still responsible if something goes wrong with payroll, taxes, or compliance. With an EOR, the provider takes on full responsibility as the legal employer.

How large and distributed is your team?
If you are scaling in one country where you already have infrastructure, a PEO can streamline HR and payroll. If you are building small teams across multiple countries, an EOR is the more practical choice.

How do you want to manage costs?
PEO fees are often lower per employee, but you still absorb the cost of maintaining entities. EOR fees are higher, but they include compliance, payroll, and benefits in one predictable package.

The practical takeaway:Use a PEO if you already have entities and want to simplify HR administration.Use an EOR if you want to enter new markets quickly, avoid entity setup, or shift compliance risk to a partner.

Also Read: The Need for EOR, PEO, and AOR

Vendor Due-Diligence Checklist

Before you sign with any PEO or EOR provider, run through this list. It will help you surface gaps that usually only show up after onboarding.

  • Entity ownership: Do they own entities, or depend on third-party partners?
  • Country SLAs: Are service-level agreements published for payroll, onboarding, and compliance?
  • System integrations: Does the platform connect with your HRIS or ERP, or will you be exporting CSVs every month?
  • Pricing transparency: Are FX spreads, markups, and local tax pass-throughs clearly shown?
  • Payroll QA controls: What safeguards exist to catch errors before money goes out?

Did you know?

Tarmack helps you easily hire international talent as your full time employees without opening international subsidiaries. Find out more about our Employer of Record services

Learn More

How Tarmack Does it 

We help you hire the people you need, when you need them, without creating compliance debt.

Tarmack is built for companies that want speed without cutting corners:

  • EOR coverage where you don’t have an entity: hire in days, not months.
  • Payroll and compliance handled locally: contracts, benefits, and filings are country-specific.
  • Scale without lock-in: start with EOR, convert to your own entity later, and keep employees on track.
  • Visibility you can trust: sample payslips, invoices, and SLAs upfront so there are no surprises.

Most providers sell “simplicity.” We focus on accuracy and transparency. That’s why teams expanding into new markets use Tarmack as their global employer of record.

Request a demo to see how Tarmack makes global hiring compliant from day one.

SHARETarmack-FacebookTarmack-LinkedInTarmack-Twitter

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What’s the key difference between a PEO and an EOR?

A PEO works through co-employment. You must have a legal entity in-country, and you share compliance liability. An EOR becomes the legal employer on your behalf, so you can hire without creating an entity, and the provider carries the compliance burden.

Do I need a PEO if I already have HR staff?

Not necessarily. A PEO can add value if you want to outsource payroll, benefits, and HR admin for employees on your own entity. But if your HR team already manages these well, a PEO may not be required.

What’s the main disadvantage of a PEO compared to an EOR?

A PEO requires you to own an entity and still leaves you exposed to compliance risk. If you hire abroad without an entity or want liability taken off your books, a PEO won’t solve that problem.

When should I choose an EOR over a PEO?

Choose an EOR if you need to hire in a country where you don’t have an entity, want to move quickly, or prefer the provider to take on full compliance responsibility. PEOs are better suited for established operations where HR outsourcing is the main goal.

Isn’t an EOR more expensive than a PEO?

EOR fees are usually higher per employee, but they bundle payroll, benefits, compliance, and entity costs into one package. With a PEO, you may pay less per employee but absorb the cost of setting up and maintaining entities. Over time, the EOR can be more cost-efficient if you’re hiring in new markets.

Can I switch from an EOR to a PEO later?

Yes. Many companies start with an EOR to hire quickly in new markets, then transition to a PEO or their own HR function once they establish an entity. The right provider will support a smooth transition.
SHARETarmack-FacebookTarmack-LinkedInTarmack-Twitter